part of the reason is that the theory of regexes boils everything down to a single yes/no question - does this string match or not? that's clean and great for proving theorems, but it throws away nearly everything that matters in practice: where the matches are, how long they are, and how many there are. once you reduce regexes to "match or no match", the all-matches problem simply disappears from view. whether experts are consciously ignoring it or the framing just doesn't surface it as a question, i can't tell - and i won't hold it against them. but it really does make me question the value of those theorems. if you have to throw away the connection to real-world use, what exactly is it a theory of?
«Это станет катастрофой». Как США хотят взять под контроль Ормузский пролив и может ли Иран этому помешать?00:10，推荐阅读搜狗输入法获取更多信息
，详情可参考谷歌
Predictably, those versions slipped past the filter. Keyword moderation has always been something of a cat-and-mouse game, and this isn’t any different.。关于这个话题，超级权重提供了深入分析
14:12, 13 марта 2026Бывший СССР